Found 9 results
Author [ Title
] Year Filters: Keyword is CHIPS and Author is Peter von Dadelszen [Clear All Filters]
. 34 weeks of gestation-lost in translation. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2014;36(6):480-481. 
(706.24 KB)
(706.24 KB). Can adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes be predicted when blood pressure becomes elevated? Secondary analyses from the CHIPS (Control of Hypertension In Pregnancy Study) randomized controlled trial. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2016;95(7):763-76. (803.67 KB)
(803.67 KB). The CHIPS Randomized Controlled Trial (Control of Hypertension in Pregnancy Study): Is Severe Hypertension Just an Elevated Blood Pressure?. Hypertension. 2016;68(5):1153-1159. (476.19 KB)
(476.19 KB). CHIPS-Child: Testing the developmental programming hypothesis in the offspring of the CHIPS trial. Pregnancy Hypertens. 2018;14:15-22. (1011.52 KB)
(1011.52 KB). Control of Hypertension In Pregnancy Study randomised controlled trial-are the results dependent on the choice of labetalol or methyldopa?. BJOG. 2016;123(7):1135-41. (144.71 KB)
(144.71 KB). The Cost Implications of Less Tight Versus Tight Control of Hypertension in Pregnancy (CHIPS Trial). Hypertension. 2016;68(4):1049-55. (470.91 KB)
(470.91 KB). Influence of Gestational Age at Initiation of Antihypertensive Therapy: Secondary Analysis of CHIPS Trial Data (Control of Hypertension in Pregnancy Study). Hypertension. 2018;71(6):1170-1177. (303.94 KB)
(303.94 KB). Less-tight versus tight control of hypertension in pregnancy. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(24):2367-8. (515.75 KB)
(515.75 KB). Women's views and postpartum follow-up in the CHIPS Trial (Control of Hypertension in Pregnancy Study). Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2016;206:105-113. (412.73 KB)
(412.73 KB)