Diagnosis, evaluation, and management of the hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2008;30(3 Suppl):S1-S2.
(1.73 MB)
. 
Abnormal liver function tests as predictors of adverse maternal outcomes in women with preeclampsia. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2011;33(10):995-1004.
(280.12 KB)
. 
Advocacy organisations as partners in pre-eclampsia progress: patient involvement improves outcomes. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2011;25(4):523-36.
(438.09 KB)
. 
Assessment, surveillance and prognosis in pre-eclampsia. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2011;25(4):449-62.
(178.71 KB)
. 
The Canadian Perinatal Network: a national network focused on threatened preterm birth at 22 to 28 weeks' gestation. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2011;33(2):111-120.
(322.85 KB)
. 
Magnesium Sulphate for Fetal Neuroprotection. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada. 2011;33(5):516 - 529.
(298.54 KB)
. 
Oxygen saturation as a predictor of adverse maternal outcomes in women with preeclampsia. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2011;33(7):705-714.
(383.37 KB)
. 
PIERS proteinuria: relationship with adverse maternal and perinatal outcome. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2011;33(6):588-597.
(292.91 KB)
. 
PIERS proteinuria: relationship with adverse maternal and perinatal outcome. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2011;33(6):588-597.
(292.91 KB)
. 
Prediction of adverse maternal outcomes in pre-eclampsia: development and validation of the fullPIERS model. Lancet. 2011;377(9761):219-27.
(201.46 KB)
. 
The role of platelet counts in the assessment of inpatient women with preeclampsia. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2011;33(9):900-8.
(370.8 KB)
. 
Therapeutics and anaesthesia. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2011;25(4):477-90.
(187.9 KB)
. 
Using clinical symptoms to predict adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes in women with preeclampsia: data from the PIERS (Pre-eclampsia Integrated Estimate of RiSk) study. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2011;33(8):803-809.
(269.78 KB)
. 
Improving maternal and perinatal outcomes in the hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: A vision of a community-focused approach. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2012;119 Suppl 1:S30-S34.
(112.74 KB)
. 
The PIERS experience: research or quality improvement?. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2012;34(4):379-81.
(233.18 KB)
. 
Preeclampsia in low and middle income countries-health services lessons learned from the PRE-EMPT (PRE-Eclampsia-Eclampsia Monitoring, Prevention and Treatment) project. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2012;34(10):917-926.
(322.96 KB)
. 
An assessment of predictive value of the biophysical profile in women with preeclampsia using data from the fullPIERS database. Pregnancy Hypertens. 2013;3(3):166-71.
(232.97 KB)
. 
Magnesium sulphate for fetal neuroprotection: a cost-effectiveness analysis. BMC Health Serv Res. 2013;13:527.
(2 MB)
. 
Measuring maternal health: focus on maternal morbidity. Bull World Health Organ. 2013;91(10):794-6.
(660.26 KB)
. 
Performance of the fullPIERS model in predicting adverse maternal outcomes in pre-eclampsia using patient data from the PIERS (Pre-eclampsia Integrated Estimate of RiSk) cohort, collected on admission. BJOG. 2013;120(1):113-8.
(85.31 KB)
. 
Pharmacotherapy for preeclampsia in low and middle income countries: an analysis of essential medicines lists. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2013;35(3):215-223.
(529.81 KB)
. 
PRE-EMPT (PRE-eclampsia-Eclampsia Monitoring, Prevention and Treatment): A low and middle income country initiative to reduce the global burden of maternal, fetal and infant death and disease related to pre-eclampsia. Pregnancy Hypertens. 2013;3(4):199-202.
(183.96 KB)
. 
Prevention and treatment of postpartum hypertension. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;(4):CD004351.
(447.63 KB)
. 
Random urine albumin:creatinine ratio in high-risk pregnancy - Is it clinically useful?. Pregnancy Hypertens. 2013;3(2):112-4.
(189.28 KB)
. 
Unexpected random urinary protein:creatinine ratio results-limitations of the pyrocatechol violet-dye method. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2013;13:152.
(834.74 KB)
. 
34 weeks of gestation-lost in translation. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2014;36(6):480-481.
(706.24 KB)
. 
Effect of magnesium sulphate on fetal heart rate parameters: a systematic review. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2014;36(12):1055-1064.
(1.57 MB)
. 
Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: a systematic review of international clinical practice guidelines. PLoS One. 2014;9(12):e113715.
(359.44 KB)
. 
Magnesium sulphate for the management of preeclampsia and eclampsia in low and middle income countries: a systematic review of tested dosing regimens. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2014;36(2):154-163.
(1.42 MB)
. 
Oral antihypertensive therapy for severe hypertension in pregnancy and postpartum: a systematic review. BJOG. 2014;121(10):1210-8; discussion 1220.
(158.15 KB)
. 
Predicting complications in pre-eclampsia: external validation of the fullPIERS model using the PETRA trial dataset. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2014;179:58-62.
(317.15 KB)
. 
Pre-eclampsia: an update. Curr Hypertens Rep. 2014;16(8):454.
(486.35 KB)
. 
A risk prediction model for the assessment and triage of women with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy in low-resourced settings: the miniPIERS (Pre-eclampsia Integrated Estimate of RiSk) multi-country prospective cohort study. PLoS Med. 2014;11(1):e1001589.
(353.97 KB)
. 
Uric Acid as a predictor of adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes in women hospitalized with preeclampsia. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2014;36(10):870-877.
(1021.64 KB)
. 
Assessing the incremental value of blood oxygen saturation (SpO(2)) in the miniPIERS (Pre-eclampsia Integrated Estimate of RiSk) Risk Prediction Model. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2015;37(1):16-24.
(1.11 MB)
. 
Development and internal validation of a multivariable model to predict perinatal death in pregnancy hypertension. Pregnancy Hypertens. 2015;5(4):315-21.
(505.41 KB)
. 
Economic evaluation of Community Level Interventions for Pre-eclampsia (CLIP) in South Asian and African countries: a study protocol. Implement Sci. 2015;10:76.
(1.88 MB)
. 
The hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (29.3). Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2015;29(5):643-57.
(227.04 KB)
. 
Labetalol for hypertension in pregnancy. Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2015;14(3):453-61.
(463.16 KB)
. 
Less-tight versus tight control of hypertension in pregnancy. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(24):2367-8.
(515.75 KB)
. 
Magnesium Sulphate for Eclampsia and Fetal Neuroprotection: A Comparative Analysis of Protocols Across Canadian Tertiary Perinatal Centres. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2015;37(11):975-87.
(362.1 KB)
. 
Magnesium sulphate for fetal neuroprotection: benefits and challenges of a systematic knowledge translation project in Canada. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015;15:347.
(549.75 KB)
. 
Moving beyond silos: How do we provide distributed personalized medicine to pregnant women everywhere at scale? Insights from PRE-EMPT. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2015;131 Suppl 1:S10-5.
(662.6 KB)
. 
Can adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes be predicted when blood pressure becomes elevated? Secondary analyses from the CHIPS (Control of Hypertension In Pregnancy Study) randomized controlled trial. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2016;95(7):763-76.
(803.67 KB)
. 
The CHIPS Randomized Controlled Trial (Control of Hypertension in Pregnancy Study): Is Severe Hypertension Just an Elevated Blood Pressure?. Hypertension. 2016;68(5):1153-1159.
(476.19 KB)
. 
Community perspectives on the determinants of maternal health in rural southern Mozambique: a qualitative study. Reprod Health. 2016;13(Suppl 2):112.
(1019.85 KB)
. 
Control of Hypertension In Pregnancy Study randomised controlled trial-are the results dependent on the choice of labetalol or methyldopa?. BJOG. 2016;123(7):1135-41.
(144.71 KB)
. 
The Cost Implications of Less Tight Versus Tight Control of Hypertension in Pregnancy (CHIPS Trial). Hypertension. 2016;68(4):1049-55.
(470.91 KB)
. 
Do labetalol and methyldopa have different effects on pregnancy outcome? Analysis of data from the Control of Hypertension In Pregnancy Study (CHIPS) trial. BJOG. 2016;123(7):1143-51.
(153.93 KB)
. 
Fetal, Infant and Maternal Outcomes among Women with Prolapsed Membranes Admitted before 29 Weeks Gestation. PLoS One. 2016;11(12):e0168285.
(862.28 KB)
. 